Ceramic Vs. OEM Brake Pads

by Dennis HartmanUpdated July 07, 2023
itstillruns article image
Image by Flickr.com, courtesy of Saquan Stimpson

A car's braking system is one of its most important components. Good quality brakes are not only necessary for performance but also essential for safe driving. Brakes require occasional maintenance, including the replacement of brake pads, which are designed to wear down with use.

Ceramic brake pads are an attractive alternative for many drivers to the OEM (original equipment manufacturer) pads that came on the car when it was new. Braking performance is different for ceramic vs. OEM pads because of the friction material, durability, and lifespan of materials.


The use of ceramic brake pads is a relatively new phenomenon. For many years automakers offered new cars with brake pads that were either semi-metallic or composed of an asbestos-based compound. As health concerns grew around the use of asbestos, semi-metallic or low-metallic pads became the standard for most automakers.

Ceramic and other materials were developed by aftermarket auto part manufacturers as a high-performance option with better brake caliper that is heavy-duty with good pedal feel. Ceramic brake pads were first offered for Japanese cars in the 1990s and today are available for most makes and models of cars, trucks and SUVs.


Ceramic brake pads are composed mostly of ceramic fibers for the brake pad material. These ceramic compound fibers, along with a small amount of metal, are held together with a bonding agent that gives the pads their structure.

OEM brake pads are usually semi-metallic and contain various metals such as steel wool, shredded metal wire and iron powder.

Other metals are used as well like graphite and copper fibers, along with a filler that bonds the metallic components together.

Ceramic brake pads are softer and more consistent while semi-metallic pads are harder and contain more variations.


Despite different compositions, ceramic and OEM brake pads function in much the same way. Brake pads are used on disc brakes, which work by pinching a spinning metal rotor between two pads attached to a caliper. The caliper closes when the brake pedal is pressed, causing friction (and heat) between the pad and the rotor to slow or stop the vehicle.

Most modern cars use disc brakes in the front wheels, where more stopping power is needed, while using less expensive drum brakes in the rear. Increasingly, automakers are offering cars with four-wheel disc brakes.


Ceramic and semi-metallic brake pads each have disadvantages that drivers should be aware of. Ceramic pads are softer and therefore wear down more quickly due to brake fade and depending on factors like driving conditions, driving style, whether daily driving is occurring, and how much brake dust is being produced. These types of brake pads also cost more to replace.

Semi-metallic brake pads are harder and therefore can cause the rotor itself to wear down more quickly. They also produce more noise, since the metal shards they contain will eventually come to the surface of the pad and come into contact with the spinning rotor. This noise will continue until the shard in the pad, or the rotor itself, is worn down sufficiently.


It’s hard to determine what the “best brake pads” are. Both ceramic and semi-metallic OEM brake pads offer certain advantages over other types. Because they are soft, ceramic pads do not damage rotors and provide smooth, even friction during braking. They are used as performance brake pads. Ceramic pads are also clean and produce less dust as they wear down.

Semi-metallic pads offer the advantage of low cost, which is one of the main reasons they are used on most new vehicles. They also wear down slowly and provide good heat transfer away from the brake rotor. This helps prevent warping, which can occur when the rotor is exposed to excessive heat during commuting from the brake job.

More Articles

article divider